Source-backed comparison
SecurePoint USA vs Greetly
SecurePoint and Greetly solve different front-desk problems. SecurePoint is built for sanctions-screened visitor access, adjudication, ITAR/EAR/CMMC evidence, and after-visit exports. Greetly is stronger when the buyer wants a fast, customizable office digital receptionist: visitor self-check-in, document e-signing, flexible host notifications, and an integration-friendly reception experience.
Based on SecurePoint product capabilities and publicly available materials reviewed on 2026-06-18.
Pictured: a held possible match and a badge preview from a demo organization with fictional visitors.
Choose SecurePoint if
Your visitor program is driven by compliance-screening depth, not reception customization.
Visitors, contractors, hosts, or education parties need OFAC/BIS and multi-list sanctions screening tied to the visit record.
Your buyer is an FSO, export-control lead, compliance manager, or auditor who needs reviewer decisions and evidence exports.
ITAR, EAR, CMMC, or sanctions-screening records must be produced quickly without rebuilding spreadsheets after the visit.
Choose Greetly if
You mainly want a fast, branded office receptionist for visitor check-in and host notifications.
A polished, customizable reception experience and flexible host notifications (call, SMS, email, Slack) are the priority.
Document e-signing, badge printing, ID scanning, and an integration marketplace matter more than sanctions-adjudication depth.
Your primary buyer is office or facilities operations rather than export-control compliance.
Comparison
Where the approaches actually separate
This table only includes points we can support from SecurePoint's current product capabilities and publicly available materials.
Product focus
Purpose-built around sanctions-screened visitor access, structured adjudication, host/escort and badge evidence, and after-visit compliance exports for regulated facilities.
Greetly is a customizable cloud "digital receptionist" for offices: visitor self-check-in, document e-signing, and host notifications, with a focus on a fast, branded front-desk experience.
Sanctions and export-control screening
Screens visitors and related parties against OFAC SDN, BIS Entity List, UN, EU, and UK lists during check-in, with the result tied to the visit record for review and evidence.
Public materials describe visitor logging, NDA/waiver e-signing, and ID scanning on higher tiers; OFAC, BIS, ITAR, or CMMC sanctions/export-control screening is not described as a product capability.
Flagged-visitor adjudication
Possible matches route to a structured adjudication queue with reviewer action, escalation path, and an audit-exportable decision record.
Public materials emphasize instant host notifications and a visitor log; a sanctions-match adjudication record for FSO or assessor review is not described in current public materials.
After-visit evidence
Evidence packs connect visitor identity, screening outcome, badge state, host/escort record, and reviewer decision into one audit-ready export for ITAR, EAR, and CMMC contexts.
Public materials describe a cloud visitor log with check-in/out records and e-signed documents; a bundled sanctions/adjudication evidence pack for export-control audits is not described.
Reception experience and notifications
Focuses on compliance screening, adjudication, and evidence; supports kiosk and front-desk check-in, badging, and API/SSO paths rather than reception customization as the headline.
Public materials describe host notifications by phone call, SMS, email, and Slack, custom branding, an integration marketplace, badge printing, and ID scanning on higher tiers.
Target market and pricing posture
Built for regulated, defense-adjacent, and education facilities; pricing is per-site and sales-assisted because deployments are compliance-scoped.
Positioned for offices and small-to-mid teams, with publicly listed entry pricing for unlimited check-ins and an optional tier adding badge printing, two-way SMS, and ID scanning.
Neutral Read
Where Greetly is stronger today
A credible comparison should separate office-reception flexibility from sanctions-screening depth.
Reception experience and host notifications
Greetly publicly documents host notifications by phone call, SMS, email, and Slack, plus custom branding and visitor-type workflows. For offices that mainly need a polished, flexible front-desk experience, that notification breadth is a real strength.
Integrations and self-serve simplicity
Greetly publishes an integration marketplace, badge printing, and ID scanning on higher tiers, with transparent entry pricing. It is easy to stand up for simple office reception without a compliance-scoped rollout.
Lower entry price for simple check-in
Greetly lists accessible monthly pricing for unlimited check-ins. SecurePoint is not the lower-cost choice for teams that only need basic visitor sign-in; its focus is compliance screening and evidence.
Trust And Proof
What SecurePoint delivers today
The comparison above describes each product from its own public materials. This is ours, running. Anything claimed for SecurePoint on this page is something you can ask to see in a walkthrough.
Swipe to pan the screen
Watch a possible match get reviewed
A visitor is screened at check-in, a possible match holds the visit, and a reviewer records the decision and the reason before it continues.
Read the transcript
Visitors are screened against sanctions and denied-party lists, like OFAC's SDN list, the BIS Entity List and Denied Persons List, and the UN, UK and EU sanctions lists.
When a name comes back as a possible match to someone on a list, the visit is held. No badge can print until a person reviews it.
The case goes to the compliance queue, which shows how long each review has been waiting.
Open it to see exactly what matched: the listed name, the list it's on, and how closely the names compare.
Compare that with what you know about the visitor. Then record your decision and the reason: not a match, approve, deny, or send it for senior review.
The decision is saved with who made it and when, and the visit can continue.
SecurePoint Visitor. Screen visitors at check-in, and keep the decisions on record.
Sanctions-screened visitor access
SecurePoint screens visitors against OFAC SDN, BIS Entity List, UN, EU, and UK lists during the visit workflow and records the result.
ITAR and CMMC visitor evidence
SecurePoint Visitor pages and whitepapers are built around export-control visitor workflows, escort evidence, badge records, and physical access logs.
After-visit evidence packs
After-visit reports and evidence packs connect screening, adjudication, badge, host, and escort facts into one audit-ready export.
Frequently asked questions
When is SecurePoint the better fit than Greetly?
SecurePoint is the better fit when the requirement is compliance-screened visitor access: OFAC and BIS Entity List screening, ITAR and EAR visitor controls, CMMC visitor evidence, structured adjudication of possible matches, and after-visit evidence packs. That is a deeper compliance lane than a customizable office receptionist.
Where is Greetly stronger today?
Greetly is stronger when the buyer mainly wants a fast, branded office reception experience: flexible host notifications by call, SMS, email, or Slack, document e-signing, an integration marketplace, badge printing, and transparent entry pricing for simple visitor check-in.
Does SecurePoint replace Greetly?
They solve different problems. SecurePoint should be evaluated as a compliance-screening visitor management and evidence system for regulated facilities. Greetly should be evaluated as a customizable office receptionist. The right choice depends on whether the buyer needs sanctions-screening depth or reception flexibility.
What should defense contractors compare first?
Defense contractors should compare whether the workflow captures OFAC and BIS screening results, escalates possible matches to a documented reviewer decision, supports ITAR and EAR visitor controls, and exports evidence an FSO, auditor, or assessor can review, not just whether visitors can sign in and notify a host.
Keep Comparing
Other alternatives buyers evaluate
Every comparison uses the same neutral format and notes where the alternative is stronger.
SecurePoint vs Envoy
Compliance-first screening and adjudication versus a broad enterprise workplace platform.
SecurePoint vs iLobby
Sanctions-screened visitor access compared with iLobby VisitorOS and FacilityOS.
SecurePoint vs Sign In Solutions
For defense and regulated facilities weighing compliance depth against workplace breadth.
SecurePoint vs Proxyclick (Eptura Visitor)
US export-control screening, adjudication, and audit evidence versus broader enterprise worktech.
SecurePoint vs Veristream
Sanctions screening compared with Building Intelligence SV3 secure physical-facility access.
SecurePoint vs LobbyGuard
Sanctions screening versus background-check-oriented visitor management for schools and facilities.
See the compliance-screening visitor workflow end to end
Walk through check-in, sanctions screening, possible-match review, badge state, and after-visit evidence in one focused demo.