Source-Backed Comparison
SecurePoint USA vs Proxyclick (Eptura Visitor)
SecurePoint and Proxyclick (now Eptura Visitor) solve different enterprise problems. SecurePoint is built for sanctions-screened visitor access, adjudication, ITAR/EAR/CMMC evidence, and after-visit exports. Eptura Visitor is stronger when the buyer wants enterprise visitor management inside a broader worktech suite — space, asset, and workplace-experience apps on one architecture — with facial-recognition access and a large global footprint.
Based on SecurePoint repo truth and publicly available materials reviewed on 2026-06-18.
Choose SecurePoint if
Your visitor program is driven by US export-control screening depth, not workplace-suite consolidation.
Visitors, contractors, hosts, or education parties need OFAC SDN and BIS Entity List screening tied to the visit record.
Your buyer is an FSO, export-control lead, compliance manager, or auditor who needs reviewer decisions and evidence exports.
ITAR, EAR, CMMC, or sanctions-screening records must be produced quickly without rebuilding spreadsheets after the visit.
Choose Eptura Visitor if
You want enterprise visitor management as part of a broader workplace-operations platform.
Space management, asset/maintenance management, or workplace-experience modules are required in the same suite.
Facial-recognition access, conditional-access QR codes, and broad access-control integrations are higher priority than sanctions-adjudication depth.
Your primary buyer is workplace or facilities operations rather than export-control compliance.
Comparison
Where the approaches actually separate
This table only includes points we can defend publicly from current repo evidence and current public materials.
Product focus
Purpose-built around sanctions-screened visitor access, structured adjudication, host/escort and badge evidence, and after-visit compliance exports for US-regulated facilities.
Eptura Visitor (formerly Proxyclick) is enterprise visitor management for security and front-desk teams, positioned inside the broader Eptura worktech platform alongside space, asset, and workplace-experience apps.
Sanctions and export-control screening
Screens visitors and related parties against OFAC SDN, BIS Entity List, UN, EU, and UK lists during check-in, with results tied to the visit record for review and evidence.
Public materials describe watchlist screening against global denied-party databases for regulated industries; the named US export-control specifics (BIS Entity List, ITAR/EAR, CMMC) are not the primary public product framing.
Flagged-visitor adjudication
Possible matches route to a structured adjudication queue with reviewer action, escalation path, and an audit-exportable decision record.
Public materials emphasize automated pre-approval, conditional access, and visitor workflows; a sanctions-match adjudication record built for FSO or assessor review is not described as a primary public capability.
After-visit evidence
Evidence packs connect visitor identity, screening outcome, badge state, host/escort record, and reviewer decision into one audit-ready export for ITAR, EAR, and CMMC contexts.
Public materials describe audit trails, reporting, and compliance documentation; a bundled sanctions/adjudication evidence-pack path for export-control audits is not described in current public materials.
Identity and access technology
Focuses on screening, adjudication, and evidence rather than biometric capture; supports kiosk and front-desk check-in, badging, and API/SSO integration paths.
Public materials describe facial recognition for visitor access, conditional-access QR codes, ID verification, and access-control integrations as part of the Eptura Visitor experience.
Workplace platform breadth
Focused on compliance screening, visitor operations, evidence, and related regulated-workflow products rather than workplace operations as a suite.
Eptura publicly packages visitor management with space management, asset/maintenance management, and workplace-experience apps on one shared architecture.
Neutral Read
Where Proxyclick / Eptura Visitor is stronger today
A credible comparison should separate workplace-suite breadth from US export-control screening depth.
Broader worktech suite
Eptura publicly packages visitor management with space management, asset and maintenance management, and workplace-experience apps on one architecture. Buyers consolidating workplace operations may prefer that breadth.
Enterprise scale and access-control story
Eptura Visitor (Proxyclick) has a large global enterprise footprint and publicly documented access-control integrations, conditional-access QR codes, and ID-verification workflows. That is broader public access-control proof than SecurePoint currently publishes.
Biometric identity validation
Public materials describe facial-recognition visitor access for faster, validated entry. SecurePoint should not imply equivalent biometric-capture depth today.
Trust And Proof
What SecurePoint can publish clearly right now
Sanctions-screened visitor access
SecurePoint screens visitors against OFAC SDN, BIS Entity List, UN, EU, and UK lists during the visit workflow and records the result.
ITAR and CMMC visitor evidence
SecurePoint Visitor pages and whitepapers are built around export-control visitor workflows, escort evidence, badge records, and physical access logs.
After-visit evidence packs
After-visit reports and evidence packs connect screening, adjudication, badge, host, and escort facts into one audit-ready export.
Frequently asked questions
When is SecurePoint the better fit than Proxyclick / Eptura Visitor?
SecurePoint is the better fit when the buying requirement is US export-control visitor compliance: OFAC SDN and BIS Entity List screening, ITAR and EAR visitor controls, CMMC visitor evidence, structured adjudication of possible matches, and after-visit evidence packs. That is a narrower but deeper compliance lane than enterprise workplace visitor operations.
Where is Proxyclick / Eptura Visitor stronger today?
Eptura is stronger when the buyer wants enterprise visitor management as part of a broader worktech suite — space management, asset and maintenance management, and workplace experience on one architecture — plus facial-recognition access, conditional-access QR codes, and a large global enterprise footprint.
Does SecurePoint replace Eptura Visitor?
Not as a workplace platform. SecurePoint should be evaluated as a compliance-screening visitor management and evidence system for regulated facilities. Eptura should be evaluated as a worktech suite where visitor management is one module. The right choice depends on whether the buyer needs sanctions-screening depth or workplace-suite breadth.
What should defense contractors compare first?
Defense contractors should compare whether the workflow captures OFAC and BIS screening results, escalates possible matches to a documented reviewer decision, supports ITAR and EAR visitor controls, and exports evidence an FSO, auditor, or assessor can review without rebuilding records after the visit.
See the compliance-screening visitor workflow end to end
Walk through check-in, sanctions screening, possible-match review, badge state, and after-visit evidence in one focused demo.